<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1135 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order deleting the addition of share capital/share application money, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It found that the Assessee had proven the transaction&#039;s genuineness and that the AO failed to establish the share application money as undisclosed income. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification and examination before rejecting evidence and suggested reopening assessments of the individuals providing the share capital money.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 10:20:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1135 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order deleting the addition of share capital/share application money, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It found that the Assessee had proven the transaction&#039;s genuineness and that the AO failed to establish the share application money as undisclosed income. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification and examination before rejecting evidence and suggested reopening assessments of the individuals providing the share capital money.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>