<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 71 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9675</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 5,000 to the Patna HC Legal Services Committee within eight weeks. It held that the reassessment order was not without jurisdiction, emphasizing the need to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal before invoking constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The court&#039;s observations were tentative and focused on the importance of following the prescribed statutory appellate procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 71 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9675</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 5,000 to the Patna HC Legal Services Committee within eight weeks. It held that the reassessment order was not without jurisdiction, emphasizing the need to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal before invoking constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The court&#039;s observations were tentative and focused on the importance of following the prescribed statutory appellate procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>