https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194022 The Petition was dismissed primarily due to the failure to serve the statutory notice as required by law and the substantial defence raised by the Respondent-guarantor regarding defective machinery supplied to the principal borrower. The Court, bound by a previous order addressing a similar defence, dismissed the Petition against another guarantor. Consequently, the present Petition was dismissed with no order as to costs. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Aug 2017 10:20:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194022 The Petition was dismissed primarily due to the failure to serve the statutory notice as required by law and the substantial defence raised by the Respondent-guarantor regarding defective machinery supplied to the principal borrower. The Court, bound by a previous order addressing a similar defence, dismissed the Petition against another guarantor. Consequently, the present Petition was dismissed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194022