https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347013 The High Court set aside the Tribunal's decision to grant a 42% deduction from the gross receipts to the medical practitioner for suppressed receipts, citing insufficient evidence. The Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence and proper guidelines for deductions related to non-receipt of fees and medicine costs. The Tribunal's order was overturned, and the case was directed back for reassessment in accordance with the law. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347013 The High Court set aside the Tribunal's decision to grant a 42% deduction from the gross receipts to the medical practitioner for suppressed receipts, citing insufficient evidence. The Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence and proper guidelines for deductions related to non-receipt of fees and medicine costs. The Tribunal's order was overturned, and the case was directed back for reassessment in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347013