https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347009 The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the preliminary objection regarding their maintainability under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court applied the principle from the Sarguja Transport Service case, which prohibits filing fresh petitions on the same cause of action if earlier petitions were withdrawn without permission. The court found the petitioner had suppressed material facts and engaged in "bench hunting" tactics. The dismissal was based on public policy to prevent court process abuse, with no reflection on the controversy's merits, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through appropriate legal channels. en-us Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347009 The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the preliminary objection regarding their maintainability under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court applied the principle from the Sarguja Transport Service case, which prohibits filing fresh petitions on the same cause of action if earlier petitions were withdrawn without permission. The court found the petitioner had suppressed material facts and engaged in "bench hunting" tactics. The dismissal was based on public policy to prevent court process abuse, with no reflection on the controversy's merits, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through appropriate legal channels. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347009