<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346999</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in a tax deduction dispute, ruling that the telecasting fees paid by the assessee to TV channels fell under section 194C, not 194J, for TDS purposes. The ITAT found the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning sound, emphasizing the relevance of statutory provisions and legal precedents in determining the appropriate TDS treatment. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:06:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346999</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in a tax deduction dispute, ruling that the telecasting fees paid by the assessee to TV channels fell under section 194C, not 194J, for TDS purposes. The ITAT found the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning sound, emphasizing the relevance of statutory provisions and legal precedents in determining the appropriate TDS treatment. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>