<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1040 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346982</link>
    <description>An exemption notification granting nil duty up to aggregate clearances of Rs. 85 lakhs in a financial year, subject to non-availment of Modvat credit, was satisfied where credit was not taken during the exempt period. Availing Modvat credit only after crossing the threshold, while paying duty at the normal rate for later clearances, did not defeat the earlier exemption because there was no prohibition on opting out of the exemption mid-year. The demand was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1040 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346982</link>
      <description>An exemption notification granting nil duty up to aggregate clearances of Rs. 85 lakhs in a financial year, subject to non-availment of Modvat credit, was satisfied where credit was not taken during the exempt period. Availing Modvat credit only after crossing the threshold, while paying duty at the normal rate for later clearances, did not defeat the earlier exemption because there was no prohibition on opting out of the exemption mid-year. The demand was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>