<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1039 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, ruling that cutting, slitting, and printing of aluminum foils did not amount to manufacture and fell within the Small Scale Industry exemption limit. The decision was based on the applicability of a Supreme Court decision and the distinction of processes involved in previous cases cited by both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:00:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1039 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, ruling that cutting, slitting, and printing of aluminum foils did not amount to manufacture and fell within the Small Scale Industry exemption limit. The decision was based on the applicability of a Supreme Court decision and the distinction of processes involved in previous cases cited by both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>