https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346975 The Central Excise Appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal, upholding the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC due to the removal of goods without payment of duty. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not deny the shortage of goods or the removal of goods without payment of duty, leading to the penalty being justified. Rulings from Punjab and Haryana High Court and Allahabad High Court supported the imposition of penalty in cases where duty has escaped payment. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Department, affirming the penalty under Section 11AC. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346975 The Central Excise Appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal, upholding the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC due to the removal of goods without payment of duty. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not deny the shortage of goods or the removal of goods without payment of duty, leading to the penalty being justified. Rulings from Punjab and Haryana High Court and Allahabad High Court supported the imposition of penalty in cases where duty has escaped payment. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Department, affirming the penalty under Section 11AC. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346975