https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346971 The Court allowed the appeal and condoned the delay in filing before CESTAT. The appellant's claim of ignorance of the order due to unsuccessful service attempts was accepted as sufficient cause for the delay. The Court noted that denying the appeal would prevent the appellant from addressing remaining dues, leading to a decision in favor of the appellant to ensure justice. CESTAT was directed to proceed with the appeal hearing after notifying the parties. en-us Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:58:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346971 The Court allowed the appeal and condoned the delay in filing before CESTAT. The appellant's claim of ignorance of the order due to unsuccessful service attempts was accepted as sufficient cause for the delay. The Court noted that denying the appeal would prevent the appellant from addressing remaining dues, leading to a decision in favor of the appellant to ensure justice. CESTAT was directed to proceed with the appeal hearing after notifying the parties. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346971