<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1024 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346966</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Court dismissed the appeal consequentially because the relied upon earlier appeal had already been dismissed on 23 April 2015. The order does not record any separate substantive determination on the customs dispute in this proceeding; it merely follows the disposal of the connected matter and brings the present appeal to an end.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1024 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346966</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Court dismissed the appeal consequentially because the relied upon earlier appeal had already been dismissed on 23 April 2015. The order does not record any separate substantive determination on the customs dispute in this proceeding; it merely follows the disposal of the connected matter and brings the present appeal to an end.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>