<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1020 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346962</link>
    <description>Reassessment based on website-derived purchase mismatch and alleged interstate sales suppression was set aside because the taxpayer was not furnished the relied-on invoice and dealer particulars, depriving it of an effective reply and personal hearing. The reassessment on alleged mis-declaration of value, based solely on DRI material, was also premature because customs adjudication had not concluded and the underlying duty liability had not attained finality. The court therefore interfered in part, directed disclosure of the relied-on materials and opportunity to object, and left further action on the third head open until completion of customs proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1020 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346962</link>
      <description>Reassessment based on website-derived purchase mismatch and alleged interstate sales suppression was set aside because the taxpayer was not furnished the relied-on invoice and dealer particulars, depriving it of an effective reply and personal hearing. The reassessment on alleged mis-declaration of value, based solely on DRI material, was also premature because customs adjudication had not concluded and the underlying duty liability had not attained finality. The court therefore interfered in part, directed disclosure of the relied-on materials and opportunity to object, and left further action on the third head open until completion of customs proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>