<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1015 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346957</link>
    <description>The court directed the cooperative bank to prioritize the sale of the first two properties listed in Schedule &quot;B&quot; to recover outstanding dues. If the liabilities persist after the sale of these properties, the bank was allowed to proceed with the sale of the fourth property. The petitioner must be informed before selling the fourth property to explore other options for clearing the remaining balance. The petitioner was prohibited from initiating new legal proceedings related to property sale without court permission to prevent further delays due to ongoing litigation. The judgment aimed to facilitate a fair resolution for both parties and ensure transparency in the recovery process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:55:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1015 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346957</link>
      <description>The court directed the cooperative bank to prioritize the sale of the first two properties listed in Schedule &quot;B&quot; to recover outstanding dues. If the liabilities persist after the sale of these properties, the bank was allowed to proceed with the sale of the fourth property. The petitioner must be informed before selling the fourth property to explore other options for clearing the remaining balance. The petitioner was prohibited from initiating new legal proceedings related to property sale without court permission to prevent further delays due to ongoing litigation. The judgment aimed to facilitate a fair resolution for both parties and ensure transparency in the recovery process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>