https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346954 An attachment-confirmation order passed by a single-member adjudicating authority without a Judicial Member was held unsustainable where a connected High Court judgment had already finalised that such serious questions of law and fact required a bench including a Judicial Member; the benefit of that ruling extended to similarly placed co-noticees on parity. The proceedings were also found vitiated because the appellants were denied reasonable time to reply, their request for adjournment was rejected, and the matter was decided in haste, contrary to natural justice. The appeals succeeded, the order was set aside, and the matters were remitted for fresh adjudication with time to file replies, while the attachment continued. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:55:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346954 An attachment-confirmation order passed by a single-member adjudicating authority without a Judicial Member was held unsustainable where a connected High Court judgment had already finalised that such serious questions of law and fact required a bench including a Judicial Member; the benefit of that ruling extended to similarly placed co-noticees on parity. The proceedings were also found vitiated because the appellants were denied reasonable time to reply, their request for adjournment was rejected, and the matter was decided in haste, contrary to natural justice. The appeals succeeded, the order was set aside, and the matters were remitted for fresh adjudication with time to file replies, while the attachment continued. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346954