<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 77 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9664</link>
    <description>The court held that &#039;interest on securities&#039; is not chargeable to interest-tax under the Interest-tax Act for the assessment year 1995-96. The appellant&#039;s argument that the exclusionary clause deletion brought it within the scope of &quot;interest on loans and advances&quot; was rejected. The court relied on a judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, emphasizing the distinction between investments and advances in banks&#039; balance sheets. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 77 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9664</link>
      <description>The court held that &#039;interest on securities&#039; is not chargeable to interest-tax under the Interest-tax Act for the assessment year 1995-96. The appellant&#039;s argument that the exclusionary clause deletion brought it within the scope of &quot;interest on loans and advances&quot; was rejected. The court relied on a judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, emphasizing the distinction between investments and advances in banks&#039; balance sheets. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>