https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194001 The Court set aside the order of sanction for prosecution given by the Chief Minister, ruling that pursuing prosecution against a retired individual for a minimal loss of Rs. 2,750 was unreasonable. The Court found no new evidence presented between the initial refusal to sanction and the subsequent order, indicating that the matter fell under the Law Minister's jurisdiction as per the Rules of Business. The Court concluded that involving the Chief Minister was unnecessary, and the order lacked proper consideration. Consequently, the Chief Minister's order was overturned, and the appeals were resolved accordingly. en-us Thu, 06 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:35:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194001 The Court set aside the order of sanction for prosecution given by the Chief Minister, ruling that pursuing prosecution against a retired individual for a minimal loss of Rs. 2,750 was unreasonable. The Court found no new evidence presented between the initial refusal to sanction and the subsequent order, indicating that the matter fell under the Law Minister's jurisdiction as per the Rules of Business. The Court concluded that involving the Chief Minister was unnecessary, and the order lacked proper consideration. Consequently, the Chief Minister's order was overturned, and the appeals were resolved accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194001