https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193999 Inherent powers may be used to quash criminal proceedings where an inordinate, unexplained delay after the raid, coupled with the Public Prosecutor's view that the case was unfit for prosecution and the initial refusal of sanction by the Revenue Commissioner, makes continuation unjust and oppressive. On those facts, the prosecution had remained pending for a prolonged period without adequate justification, and its continuation was treated as an abuse of process. The criminal prosecution and the proceedings before the Special Judge were quashed. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:12:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193999 Inherent powers may be used to quash criminal proceedings where an inordinate, unexplained delay after the raid, coupled with the Public Prosecutor's view that the case was unfit for prosecution and the initial refusal of sanction by the Revenue Commissioner, makes continuation unjust and oppressive. On those facts, the prosecution had remained pending for a prolonged period without adequate justification, and its continuation was treated as an abuse of process. The criminal prosecution and the proceedings before the Special Judge were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193999