<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 999 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346941</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed the availability of service tax credit on specific services utilized by different units, with the denial of Cenvat credit based solely on unit utilization deemed unjustified. The extended period of limitation for availing credit was found unjustifiable without evidence of malafide, leading to the setting aside of the penalty imposed. Additionally, the denial of Cenvat credit for moulds sent to job workers was to be reconsidered based on established legal principles. The appellant was granted the opportunity to contest the demands and penalties based on legal grounds and precedent decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 999 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346941</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed the availability of service tax credit on specific services utilized by different units, with the denial of Cenvat credit based solely on unit utilization deemed unjustified. The extended period of limitation for availing credit was found unjustifiable without evidence of malafide, leading to the setting aside of the penalty imposed. Additionally, the denial of Cenvat credit for moulds sent to job workers was to be reconsidered based on established legal principles. The appellant was granted the opportunity to contest the demands and penalties based on legal grounds and precedent decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>