<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 989 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for Excise duty on the clearance of waste and scrap. The items in question were not generated during the production of excisable goods and did not fall under dutiable goods in the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific criteria for charging Excise duty on waste and scrap, leading to the decision to allow the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:04:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 989 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for Excise duty on the clearance of waste and scrap. The items in question were not generated during the production of excisable goods and did not fall under dutiable goods in the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific criteria for charging Excise duty on waste and scrap, leading to the decision to allow the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>