https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346925 The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order rejecting the appeal petition against the Assistant Commissioner's decision. The Court directed the Revenue to identify the proper officer to handle the refund claim and instructed the petitioner to re-submit the claim to the designated officer within a week. The officer was directed to process the claim with the application date of 15.02.2016. The Court emphasized the importance of forwarding papers to the correct officer and closed the connected miscellaneous petition without imposing costs. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:03:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346925 The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order rejecting the appeal petition against the Assistant Commissioner's decision. The Court directed the Revenue to identify the proper officer to handle the refund claim and instructed the petitioner to re-submit the claim to the designated officer within a week. The officer was directed to process the claim with the application date of 15.02.2016. The Court emphasized the importance of forwarding papers to the correct officer and closed the connected miscellaneous petition without imposing costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346925