<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 979 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346921</link>
    <description>LCD panels imported for use in colour television manufacturing were examined solely on tariff classification. The Tribunal noted that the issue had already been decided in the importer&#039;s favour in an earlier matter, and the department accepted that the present case was covered by that decision. On that basis, the goods were classified under Tariff Item 9013 80 10 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, rather than Tariff Item 8529 90 90.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 979 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346921</link>
      <description>LCD panels imported for use in colour television manufacturing were examined solely on tariff classification. The Tribunal noted that the issue had already been decided in the importer&#039;s favour in an earlier matter, and the department accepted that the present case was covered by that decision. On that basis, the goods were classified under Tariff Item 9013 80 10 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, rather than Tariff Item 8529 90 90.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>