<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 977 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346919</link>
    <description>Continued non-compliance with an earlier direction to release goods led the Tribunal to invoke its procedural powers under Rule 41 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax (Procedure) Rules, 1982. On the affidavit and conduct of the customs officer, it formed the view that the order dated 12-7-2016 was being deliberately avoided. It therefore required the concerned officer to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated and issued notice to show cause against such action, returnable on the specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 977 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346919</link>
      <description>Continued non-compliance with an earlier direction to release goods led the Tribunal to invoke its procedural powers under Rule 41 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax (Procedure) Rules, 1982. On the affidavit and conduct of the customs officer, it formed the view that the order dated 12-7-2016 was being deliberately avoided. It therefore required the concerned officer to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated and issued notice to show cause against such action, returnable on the specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>