<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 972 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346914</link>
    <description>The court held that Rotary Tiller should be considered as Rotavator for exemption purposes under the Tamilnadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The assessment orders for 2013-14 and 2014-15 were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration, directing the extension of exemption benefits for the agricultural implement Rotavator. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:01:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 972 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346914</link>
      <description>The court held that Rotary Tiller should be considered as Rotavator for exemption purposes under the Tamilnadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The assessment orders for 2013-14 and 2014-15 were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration, directing the extension of exemption benefits for the agricultural implement Rotavator. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>