<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 968 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346910</link>
    <description>The court granted exemptions for filing certified copies/originals of documents and extended time for filing court fees. It ordered issuance of summons and procedural directions for the suit. Regarding jurisdiction and abuse of process in arbitration proceedings under BIPA, the court restrained defendants from further arbitration under India-UK BIPA, citing abuse of law and risk of parallel proceedings. Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC was directed within a week.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:01:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 968 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346910</link>
      <description>The court granted exemptions for filing certified copies/originals of documents and extended time for filing court fees. It ordered issuance of summons and procedural directions for the suit. Regarding jurisdiction and abuse of process in arbitration proceedings under BIPA, the court restrained defendants from further arbitration under India-UK BIPA, citing abuse of law and risk of parallel proceedings. Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC was directed within a week.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>