https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346908 The impugned orders dated 01.12.2015 and 03.03.2015 were set aside for lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a Judicial Member as directed by the High Court. The case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration after appointing a Judicial Member. The provisional attachment order remains in effect until the case is decided in compliance with the High Court's directions. The tribunal did not delve into the merits of the case but emphasized adherence to the High Court's directives. en-us Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:01:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346908 The impugned orders dated 01.12.2015 and 03.03.2015 were set aside for lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a Judicial Member as directed by the High Court. The case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration after appointing a Judicial Member. The provisional attachment order remains in effect until the case is decided in compliance with the High Court's directions. The tribunal did not delve into the merits of the case but emphasized adherence to the High Court's directives. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346908