https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346907 The court set aside the Adjudicating Authority's Order confirming the Provisional Attachment Order, finding it unjustified and a violation of law. The Appellant, deemed a victim and not a perpetrator, successfully argued against the attachment of properties under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. The court emphasized the distinction between victim and perpetrator rights, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellant and overturning the confirmation of the provisional attachment. en-us Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346907 The court set aside the Adjudicating Authority's Order confirming the Provisional Attachment Order, finding it unjustified and a violation of law. The Appellant, deemed a victim and not a perpetrator, successfully argued against the attachment of properties under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. The court emphasized the distinction between victim and perpetrator rights, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellant and overturning the confirmation of the provisional attachment. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346907