https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193979 The High Court upheld the legality and validity of the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. However, as the provisional attachment order had expired after the final order by the Adjudicating Authority, rendering the issue moot, the High Court disposed of the appeals. The appellants were granted liberty to raise permissible issues before the appropriate forum. The Court did not address specific challenges to the show cause notice or the competency of the Adjudicating Authority, as the appeals were disposed of due to the mootness of the provisional attachment order. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:25:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193979 The High Court upheld the legality and validity of the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. However, as the provisional attachment order had expired after the final order by the Adjudicating Authority, rendering the issue moot, the High Court disposed of the appeals. The appellants were granted liberty to raise permissible issues before the appropriate forum. The Court did not address specific challenges to the show cause notice or the competency of the Adjudicating Authority, as the appeals were disposed of due to the mootness of the provisional attachment order. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193979