https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9650 The court quashed the transfer order dated January 23, 2004, and the consequential notice dated March 1, 2004, due to the absence of recorded reasons in the transfer order. The court directed a fresh order to be passed with proper recording and communication of reasons, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the right to challenge such orders. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9650 The court quashed the transfer order dated January 23, 2004, and the consequential notice dated March 1, 2004, due to the absence of recorded reasons in the transfer order. The court directed a fresh order to be passed with proper recording and communication of reasons, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the right to challenge such orders. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9650