<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (1) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193967</link>
    <description>A prior writ proceeding, contested on merits and dismissed after full adjudication, operated as res judicata in the later civil suit between the same parties. The controlling principle is that a matter in controversy decided by a competent court cannot be reopened in subsequent litigation, and the effect of res judicata depends on the decision and final order rather than an express discussion of every ground. Because the earlier writ dismissal rejected the grounds underlying the challenge, the respondent was barred from re-agitating the authority of the officer who terminated employment in the civil suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:09:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (1) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193967</link>
      <description>A prior writ proceeding, contested on merits and dismissed after full adjudication, operated as res judicata in the later civil suit between the same parties. The controlling principle is that a matter in controversy decided by a competent court cannot be reopened in subsequent litigation, and the effect of res judicata depends on the decision and final order rather than an express discussion of every ground. Because the earlier writ dismissal rejected the grounds underlying the challenge, the respondent was barred from re-agitating the authority of the officer who terminated employment in the civil suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>