<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1120 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193966</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the company petition, finding insufficient evidence of oppression, mismanagement, or justification for just and equitable winding up. It set aside the lower court&#039;s judgment, vacated interim orders, and dismissed pending applications, refusing a stay of its order. The petitioners failed to establish unfair prejudice that would warrant relief under Section 397, leading to the dismissal of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1120 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193966</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the company petition, finding insufficient evidence of oppression, mismanagement, or justification for just and equitable winding up. It set aside the lower court&#039;s judgment, vacated interim orders, and dismissed pending applications, refusing a stay of its order. The petitioners failed to establish unfair prejudice that would warrant relief under Section 397, leading to the dismissal of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>