<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1090 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193964</link>
    <description>The petitioners sought a refund of excise duty, which was rejected by the Revenue Authority citing limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The petitioners argued for a refund under mistake of payment, relying on a previous case. The Court differentiated the present case, dismissed the petition, and emphasized the need to adhere to legislative provisions for claiming refunds within specified time limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1090 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193964</link>
      <description>The petitioners sought a refund of excise duty, which was rejected by the Revenue Authority citing limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The petitioners argued for a refund under mistake of payment, relying on a previous case. The Court differentiated the present case, dismissed the petition, and emphasized the need to adhere to legislative provisions for claiming refunds within specified time limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>