<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 68 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9646</link>
    <description>The High Court of BOMBAY ruled in a case regarding the validity of a notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to reopen assessment for the assessment year 1985-86. The court found that the reasons for reopening did not demonstrate failure to disclose material facts by the assessee, leading to the notices being deemed without jurisdiction. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashed the notices, and made the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 68 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9646</link>
      <description>The High Court of BOMBAY ruled in a case regarding the validity of a notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to reopen assessment for the assessment year 1985-86. The court found that the reasons for reopening did not demonstrate failure to disclose material facts by the assessee, leading to the notices being deemed without jurisdiction. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashed the notices, and made the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>