https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193958 The court held that the writ petition filed by a foreign company under Article 226 challenging a contract award in India was not maintainable. While acknowledging that foreigners have some fundamental rights under the Constitution, the court emphasized that rights under Article 19 are exclusive to Indian citizens. The court concluded that the petitioner could not claim a violation of Article 14 independently but must consider it in conjunction with Article 19(1)(g), which pertains only to citizens. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, clarifying that fundamental rights available to citizens cannot be extended to non-citizens through Article 14. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:04:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193958 The court held that the writ petition filed by a foreign company under Article 226 challenging a contract award in India was not maintainable. While acknowledging that foreigners have some fundamental rights under the Constitution, the court emphasized that rights under Article 19 are exclusive to Indian citizens. The court concluded that the petitioner could not claim a violation of Article 14 independently but must consider it in conjunction with Article 19(1)(g), which pertains only to citizens. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, clarifying that fundamental rights available to citizens cannot be extended to non-citizens through Article 14. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193958