https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193956 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an Iranian citizen, in a case concerning the non-issuance of a Detailed Marks Certificate for B.A. Part I Examination. The University's accusation of the petitioner concealing facts was deemed baseless as he had disclosed his previous qualifications. The delay in issuing the certificate was attributed to the University's oversight. The court refuted the University's argument against the petitioner taking two major examinations simultaneously, emphasizing the lack of clarity in instructions provided to candidates. The University was directed to provide the certificate within two weeks and pay costs of Rs. 5000, upholding the petitioner's right to seek relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:16:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193956 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an Iranian citizen, in a case concerning the non-issuance of a Detailed Marks Certificate for B.A. Part I Examination. The University's accusation of the petitioner concealing facts was deemed baseless as he had disclosed his previous qualifications. The delay in issuing the certificate was attributed to the University's oversight. The court refuted the University's argument against the petitioner taking two major examinations simultaneously, emphasizing the lack of clarity in instructions provided to candidates. The University was directed to provide the certificate within two weeks and pay costs of Rs. 5000, upholding the petitioner's right to seek relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193956