<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 924 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346866</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the remaining addition of Rs. 15,36,500 in the assessment for A.Y. 2004-05. The ITAT found the explanations regarding expenses and jewellery to be supported by evidence, directing the deletion of the entire addition. The decision underscores the significance of providing detailed explanations and supporting evidence in tax assessments, emphasizing the burden of proof on both taxpayers and tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:55:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 924 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346866</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the remaining addition of Rs. 15,36,500 in the assessment for A.Y. 2004-05. The ITAT found the explanations regarding expenses and jewellery to be supported by evidence, directing the deletion of the entire addition. The decision underscores the significance of providing detailed explanations and supporting evidence in tax assessments, emphasizing the burden of proof on both taxpayers and tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>