<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 920 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346862</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of advance subscription income to taxable income and the disallowance of professional fees paid to Mr. Sagnik Goswami. The ITAT held that under the mercantile system, advance subscription income should be adjusted in subsequent years and not taxed in the year of receipt. Additionally, the disallowance of professional fees was deemed unjustified as Mr. Sagnik Goswami&#039;s qualifications and earnings were comparable to other professionals, warranting no disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 920 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346862</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of advance subscription income to taxable income and the disallowance of professional fees paid to Mr. Sagnik Goswami. The ITAT held that under the mercantile system, advance subscription income should be adjusted in subsequent years and not taxed in the year of receipt. Additionally, the disallowance of professional fees was deemed unjustified as Mr. Sagnik Goswami&#039;s qualifications and earnings were comparable to other professionals, warranting no disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>