https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346857 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues including the treatment of a grant received under PACER, technical report expenditure, and repairs and maintenance expenses. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to review the disallowed non-compete fees and upheld the eligibility for additional depreciation on plant and machinery. The decision was based on precedents and interpretations of relevant tax laws, ultimately favoring the assessee on most contested matters. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346857 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues including the treatment of a grant received under PACER, technical report expenditure, and repairs and maintenance expenses. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to review the disallowed non-compete fees and upheld the eligibility for additional depreciation on plant and machinery. The decision was based on precedents and interpretations of relevant tax laws, ultimately favoring the assessee on most contested matters. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346857