https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346851 The Tribunal found the Commissioner's order improper and remanded the case for denovo consideration, allowing all issues to be reconsidered. The appellant, a Consulting Engineer and Architect Services provider, faced a demand for differential service tax, interest, and penalties for a specific period. The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand, emphasizing the need for proper verification and quantification of tax liabilities. Another appeal by the department was dismissed as the matter was remanded for reconsideration, underscoring the importance of following legal procedures in tax cases. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:53:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346851 The Tribunal found the Commissioner's order improper and remanded the case for denovo consideration, allowing all issues to be reconsidered. The appellant, a Consulting Engineer and Architect Services provider, faced a demand for differential service tax, interest, and penalties for a specific period. The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand, emphasizing the need for proper verification and quantification of tax liabilities. Another appeal by the department was dismissed as the matter was remanded for reconsideration, underscoring the importance of following legal procedures in tax cases. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346851