<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 908 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant had paid the entire service tax amount with interest, resolving the confusion around the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal invoked Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, emphasizing the importance of clarity in tax laws and fair enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:53:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 908 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant had paid the entire service tax amount with interest, resolving the confusion around the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal invoked Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, emphasizing the importance of clarity in tax laws and fair enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>