<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 906 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the demand of service tax on Intellectual Property Rights received from abroad under the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal held that since the Intellectual Property Right in question belonged to a foreign entity not governed by Indian law, it did not fall under the definition of taxable Intellectual Property Right service. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on 10/07/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 906 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the demand of service tax on Intellectual Property Rights received from abroad under the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal held that since the Intellectual Property Right in question belonged to a foreign entity not governed by Indian law, it did not fall under the definition of taxable Intellectual Property Right service. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on 10/07/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>