<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 890 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that the duty was paid under protest, justifying the refund claim by the respondent-assessee. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, entitling them to a refund of Rs. 12,50,000, subject to any balance dues adjustment, to be processed within 45 days with applicable interest as per Rules. The case emphasizes the significance of adherence to procedural requirements and legal principles concerning refund claims in excise cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:52:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 890 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that the duty was paid under protest, justifying the refund claim by the respondent-assessee. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, entitling them to a refund of Rs. 12,50,000, subject to any balance dues adjustment, to be processed within 45 days with applicable interest as per Rules. The case emphasizes the significance of adherence to procedural requirements and legal principles concerning refund claims in excise cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>