https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346826 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for excise duty on a claimed abnormal processing loss of 16%. The decision emphasized the lack of evidence from the Revenue to substantiate the abnormality of the loss and failure to counter the appellant's claim of irrecoverable waste supported by a Chartered Engineer's certificate. The Tribunal underscored the importance of evidence-based assessments in excise duty cases and the necessity for concrete proof to uphold such demands. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:51:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346826 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for excise duty on a claimed abnormal processing loss of 16%. The decision emphasized the lack of evidence from the Revenue to substantiate the abnormality of the loss and failure to counter the appellant's claim of irrecoverable waste supported by a Chartered Engineer's certificate. The Tribunal underscored the importance of evidence-based assessments in excise duty cases and the necessity for concrete proof to uphold such demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346826