<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 877 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods as &#039;blenders&#039; under CTH 8438 for industrial use, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument for classification under CTH 8509 as domestic appliances. The Tribunal found the blenders were intended for commercial and industrial clients based on product specifications and supplier restrictions. The appeal against the confiscation of goods under section 111 (m) of the Customs Act 1962 was dismissed, affirming the original classification and setting aside the confiscation order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 877 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods as &#039;blenders&#039; under CTH 8438 for industrial use, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument for classification under CTH 8509 as domestic appliances. The Tribunal found the blenders were intended for commercial and industrial clients based on product specifications and supplier restrictions. The appeal against the confiscation of goods under section 111 (m) of the Customs Act 1962 was dismissed, affirming the original classification and setting aside the confiscation order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>