<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 875 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346817</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI rectified errors in the Final Order related to entitlement of refund claims involving anti-dumping duty. The Tribunal clarified that anti-dumping duty should be applied at the rate preceding the issuance of Notification 70/2010. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for a fresh decision. Both miscellaneous applications by the appellant were allowed, leading to rectification of errors in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:50:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 875 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346817</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI rectified errors in the Final Order related to entitlement of refund claims involving anti-dumping duty. The Tribunal clarified that anti-dumping duty should be applied at the rate preceding the issuance of Notification 70/2010. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for a fresh decision. Both miscellaneous applications by the appellant were allowed, leading to rectification of errors in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>