https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346802 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order of provisional attachment of property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, citing a violation of natural justice principles due to the appellant being in judicial custody and unable to defend himself. The matter was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority, granting the appellant three weeks to file a reply. Additionally, the Tribunal directed that both the current case and another related matter concerning the remaining 65% of the same property be decided together, emphasizing the importance of providing the appellant with an opportunity to defend his case. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:48:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346802 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order of provisional attachment of property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, citing a violation of natural justice principles due to the appellant being in judicial custody and unable to defend himself. The matter was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority, granting the appellant three weeks to file a reply. Additionally, the Tribunal directed that both the current case and another related matter concerning the remaining 65% of the same property be decided together, emphasizing the importance of providing the appellant with an opportunity to defend his case. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346802