<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1114 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193949</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a case concerning the specific return of seized betel nuts or a monetary decree. Despite the defendants&#039; non-appearance, the plaintiff provided evidence supporting their claim of illegal seizure and subsequent sale by Customs Authorities. The court emphasized the need to establish the actual value of the goods and awarded the plaintiff the assessed value of the betel nuts, along with interest and specified payment terms. The decree was to be promptly implemented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1114 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193949</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a case concerning the specific return of seized betel nuts or a monetary decree. Despite the defendants&#039; non-appearance, the plaintiff provided evidence supporting their claim of illegal seizure and subsequent sale by Customs Authorities. The court emphasized the need to establish the actual value of the goods and awarded the plaintiff the assessed value of the betel nuts, along with interest and specified payment terms. The decree was to be promptly implemented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>