<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1117 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193951</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the judgment dismissing the petition against the respondent company for improper pleading. Despite inaccuracies in the petition, the court found the substance of the claim valid, supported by the respondent&#039;s admissions of liability, corporate guarantees, and dishonoured cheques. The petition was admitted for further proceedings, emphasizing that the inaccuracies did not undermine the appellant&#039;s justified claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1117 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193951</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the judgment dismissing the petition against the respondent company for improper pleading. Despite inaccuracies in the petition, the court found the substance of the claim valid, supported by the respondent&#039;s admissions of liability, corporate guarantees, and dishonoured cheques. The petition was admitted for further proceedings, emphasizing that the inaccuracies did not undermine the appellant&#039;s justified claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>