<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 81 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9629</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that if total income in years without filed returns remains below the taxable limit after deductions, it should not be part of undisclosed income. Regarding the exemption of interest on FDRs from NRE accounts under section 10(4)(ii), the court agreed with the Tribunal that interest on NRE FDRs should be exempt to encourage foreign currency investments. The court emphasized that the original deposit in the NRE account was made in compliance with the law, allowing for interest exemption. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as both issues were decided against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 81 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9629</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that if total income in years without filed returns remains below the taxable limit after deductions, it should not be part of undisclosed income. Regarding the exemption of interest on FDRs from NRE accounts under section 10(4)(ii), the court agreed with the Tribunal that interest on NRE FDRs should be exempt to encourage foreign currency investments. The court emphasized that the original deposit in the NRE account was made in compliance with the law, allowing for interest exemption. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as both issues were decided against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>