<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 853 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346795</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 1145 days in re-filing, despite excuses related to a change in Standing Counsel and alleged issues with tracking the appeal&#039;s status. The Court found these explanations unsatisfactory, emphasizing the department&#039;s duty to monitor filings diligently. Additionally, the Court rejected the department&#039;s reliance on practice directions for e-filing appeals as a reason for the delay, stating that these directions were issued after consultation and provision of resources. Ultimately, the Court deemed the prolonged delay unjustifiable, resulting in the dismissal of the application and appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:49:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 853 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346795</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 1145 days in re-filing, despite excuses related to a change in Standing Counsel and alleged issues with tracking the appeal&#039;s status. The Court found these explanations unsatisfactory, emphasizing the department&#039;s duty to monitor filings diligently. Additionally, the Court rejected the department&#039;s reliance on practice directions for e-filing appeals as a reason for the delay, stating that these directions were issued after consultation and provision of resources. Ultimately, the Court deemed the prolonged delay unjustifiable, resulting in the dismissal of the application and appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>