<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 845 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346787</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals against orders of CIT(A) for assessment years 2009-10 &amp;amp; 2010-11 concerning the disallowance of expenditure under section 14A. It was held that there must be a direct nexus between claimed expenses and exempt income for disallowances to be justified. The Tribunal directed the deletion of disallowances under section 14A, except for charges directly related to exempt income, leading to the partial allowance of both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 845 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346787</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals against orders of CIT(A) for assessment years 2009-10 &amp;amp; 2010-11 concerning the disallowance of expenditure under section 14A. It was held that there must be a direct nexus between claimed expenses and exempt income for disallowances to be justified. The Tribunal directed the deletion of disallowances under section 14A, except for charges directly related to exempt income, leading to the partial allowance of both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>